ZOOM 606 or POD 2.0

[RobinHood]

I recently bought a ZOOM 606 and find it a good effects box, but it has a lot of "heavy metal hard rock" stuff build in it...As im more of a "soft" rock player, i would appreciate some feedback on any POD 2 users, or the diff in music between these two ( whats its best suited for ). ZOOM 606 can be a hassel to find your specific "home-made" patches...especialy if you have a lot. ...would have been nice if a person could have direct access to it and overwrite the "A1" or "C3" numbers with ie. heavy, mild, soft, or even names of your fav artist, just to give you an idea WHAT type of music youre going to play...

[arkansanguitarist2009]

I have played a pod 2.0 once and a zoom pedal before. The pod is better you can get way more different sounds and there is a lot of things to choose from on the pod. Most line 6 things are good.

[JM5150]

I just got a POD 2.0, and it is WAY cool!

[RobinHood]

I had a look at the POD 2.....and found it too look quite nice and usefull...Another thing...lets say i had to choose between the POD 2 and V-AMP2....Which one do you guys think will be best for soft-rock??
thx for the feedback guys

[Scott Parnell]

I have both the pod 2.0 and the behringer v amp 2. they both will give you more than you need for thats tyle of stuff. I like em both for certain stuff. i find the EQ is a bit more out there on the v amp2 and for that matter,, I still use it quite often. if it's a money situation,, the behringer v amp 2 beats the pod for money to quality ratio.. both of them in all honesty are great ,, and would serve well for what style you want to achieve.