What realistic examples will a Line 6 POD XT have over a Line 6 POD2.0 ?

[biggus dikkus]

I own a pod 2.0 which I use for home recording , The Line 6 own settings layer, drive, crunch and clean , I personally think are atrocious and I never use them , the rest of the settings are very usable indeed and Ive not found myself struggling to get good tones at all . My soundcard is the audigy platinum 1 so good tones from pod2.0 are very faithfully reproduced.

so if i had a pod xt, what advantages would I have over the pod2.0 ?


weird and whacky kind of tones , I am not at all interested in so what else does the xt offer to justify its significant price above the 2.0 ?

BD

[BleedingPinky]

I really don´t know mate, I got used to fiddling with an Elcheapo RP200 up til a few months back, then when GAS called my door I went ahead and bought an XTL, it sure has it´s advantages as for not having to bend my back and turn the knobs, plus it seems very versatile, but to tell you the truth I believe once you are comfortable with whatever gadget, and that little RP is great and cheap, why move on to another one? I´ve heard the POD 2.0 has some nasty tones that cannot be heard on the XT, well, I tell you, if you feel good with it just stick with it

[VHF]

The main difference is a built in soundcard matched exactly to the XT.